 |
PM |  | |
Quote | | |
Reply | | |
Full Topic | |
| Joined: | Mon Nov 21st, 2005 |
| Location: | California USA |
| Posts: | 6399 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
| Mana: |    |
God
The power source of everything, the power of creating.
Now, if each thing, no matter what it is, the chicken, or the egg, the Big Bang, or the thing called energy, or the thing called hydrogen, every thing, not being here, at this time, and then being here, at this time, or even time itself, or even the first thing from which to begin measuring time, any thing, all things, was not, then is, so the power of creation can be, as far as I know, more than one power, but where did that power come from, I don't know, so the word God, in that sense is like pointing into the unknown, as far back as there is, as far away as there is, as simple as anything ever was, then going beyond that simplicity in its simplest form, beyond that, even beyond the theoretical concept of a singularity (whatever that means) to that first ever thing ever, going beyond that, to find the source of all, and pointing to that, saying, oh, hi, there you are, you are God, nice to meet you at last.
I found it interesting to read Kurt Vonnegut's Sirens of Titan and find the stuff called the universal will to become, which was powerful stuff.
God
The power of creation
The idea, not the words.
The perception, not the thing, since I, so far, cannot actually perceive God, but I can, I think, perceive that which has been created, so I have evidence of the source of all those things having been created.
I suppose, thinking now, that everything was always here, and if so then I may have to adjust my perspective of God, who would then be just another thing that was always here, and I can think, perhaps, God may be the last one to go, and then, please, put back all the stuff that went somewhere, or nowhere, please.
I can elaborate on this viewpoint, which is derived in part from my attempts to understand the Big Bang Theory, along with the concept of simplicity versus complexity, along the lines of the concepts of entropy and ectropy, which is Thermodynamics and whatever ectropy is in fact.
I find it odd that ectropy is not recognized by any spell checkers.
Also not recognized by any spell checkers, oddly, is the word inculpatory.
I wrote too much?