View single post by Joe Kelley
 Posted: Sat Jan 14th, 2012 09:34 am
PM Quote Reply Full Topic
Joe Kelley

 

Joined: Mon Nov 21st, 2005
Location: California USA
Posts: 6399
Status: 
Offline
Mana: 
Today is 01-14-2012

Wow, that is well into the 21st Century.

Liberty Day is on the calender, make it by July 4th 2012 - why not?

What do you have to lose?

I run a very low budget On-line Presidential Campaign. I ran for office this way last Election Cycle, and now I am running for office again. last Cycle I announced as a possible Vice President a Military Soldier named Karen Kwiatkowski, for good reason, and that Military Person is still on the short list, but there is another person on that list now.

Please know Cynthia McKinny, by way of listening to the words that she has to offer to us, from a perspective earned at her own cost, earned the hard way, by working for a living, and not by the criminal way, despite the fact that she has spent a tour of duty deep into U.S.A. Inc. (LLC).

Words to the wise

I am re-reading the beginning of that article and I stumble again on some of the choices of words, in particular I take issue with the concept of ownership between The President and the Victims. To say that The President is "ours" is to miss the important point. The President isn't mine; therefore The President isn't ours when I am included into the group to be known as us.

Putting those finer details, of important points, aside, for now, I want to convey some specific words, from the article, so as to reinforce specific meaning concerning our world, the State we are in, and the impending future, if we fail to regain ground back toward Liberty and as far away from Legal Crime as is humanly possible.

Quotes:

The NTC not only has to contend with a vibrant, well-financed, grassroots-supported resistance, but the various militias of the NTC are now also fighting each other.
You may not, at first, realize the significance of those words reporting on those inhuman activities that work at, or very near, the top of the power structure that resembles a Pyramid.

You may not have a working understanding of how the Legal Crime Power System works, like a pyramid, and therefore you are, to put it mildly, in the dark.

I am often given the label of "conspiracy theorist" and I am often given words that are attributed to me, but words that I never say, words that are false, as if someone else has the power to speak for me, with authority, and I'm supposed to say that there is one person, on the top of the Pyramid, and that one person owns everyone else on the planet, lording over everyone else, controlling everyone else, and then there are 2 people slightly less powerful than that one person, and then below those two there are 4 people slightly less powerful, and then there are 8, then 16, on and on, until reaching the bottom of the Pyramid Power Struggle Network, where those at the bottom have relatively no power compared to the one at the top, and those at the bottom can be counted up to a very large number of people, sharing whatever is at the bottom, where most of the people dwell on Earth.

I wrote that, I said that, but to attribute that to me without the obvious additional text, and without the obvious context, is to attribute to me stupidity, and stupefaction, beyond reason. There isn't only one Pyramid of power all alone, without competitors, without battles fought, and without conflict, and in that context of those parts of those meetings of diverse Powers working, the POINT is missed.

Returning to the words offered by a reporter on the front lines:

he NTC not only has to contend with a vibrant, well-financed, grassroots-supported resistance, but the various militias of the NTC are now also fighting each other.
Rather than assume that I am a kook, and rather than move on to dwell at the bottom any longer, consider the brilliance of what I have learned, the hard way, by way of active work at the problem, trial and error, decades of work, piecing the puzzle together, one small detail at a time, and arriving a the whole picture, to a degree at which I can understand most of what I can see now, compared to the beginning of the work load when most of everything I saw confused me, befuddle me, and contributed to a State of Stupefaction.

Consider the clear, accurate, and measurable, provable, understanding that the Pyramid Power Struggle Network is no more when the victims are disconnected from it, since those remaining connected to that one, or any one, of those Pyramid Power Struggle Networks, will eat each other for lack of Productive Capacity. Their source of power IS the victims.

Know that much, please.

Moving on with the words of Cynthia McKinney:

In other words, those who create the chaos have a plan and in the midst of chaos, they usually are the ones who will win. Those who wrote the plan of this chaos were affiliated with the Project for a New American Century–read A Clean Break if you already haven’t. General Wesley Clark told us of the plan to invade and destroy the governments of seven countries in five years: Iraq, Syria Lebanon, Libya, Somalia, Sudan, and Iran. “These people took control of the policy in the United States,” Clark continues. He concludes, “This country was taken over by a group of people with a policy coup: Wolfowitz, Cheney, Rumsfeld, and . . . collaborators from the Project for a New American Century: they wanted us to destabilize the Middle East.” Richard Perle, Bill Kristol publicize these plans and “could hardly wait to finish Iraq so they could go into Syria,” Clark goes on. “The root of the problem is the strategy of the United States in this region. Why are Americans dying in this region? That is the issue,” he finishes.
That is one chunk of text.

Those at the top of A Pyramid Power Struggle Network can be found, since they leave paper trails, and they leave behind living witnesses, some that are victims, some that blow the whistle. What you miss, if you miss the POINT, is that they are not always the same people, but they have a commonality that is unmistakable, they are Legal Criminals. They use the power of law to commit crimes. That is the POINT. Get the POINT, or fail to do so, and your future will either be disconnection from the whole dirty business, or continued involvement in it, to either be taken to the cleaners by other people, in it, or for you to take advantage of lesser power victims, including those being tortured, by the millions, and those being mass murdered by the millions.

You don't want to know this, I know, it is tough stuff, but think for just a moment, and explain one of the Patented Absurdities that fester in the brains of those who are stolen into the Pyramid Power Struggle Networks - please consider:

A.
Jobs are Scarce
B.
People are starving to death, dying of exposure, by the millions, for lack of power
C.
Food, clothing, and materials sit in warehouses, kept "off the market", even if the food rots, so as to make food, clothing, and materials scarce, and then the price goes up, and then the food, clothing, and materials are allowed to flow again.

How much power is available when a million people will do anything to stay alive, anything, anything, anything, to get some food for their children, or themselves, and keep on living, anything, a million people, ready, willing, and able to do anything for some food: how much power is that, ready to be set to work?

How can jobs be scarce?

How can jobs be scarce while anyone, anywhere, has not eaten for a week?

There is a measurable demand for someone to do productive work, obviously, measurably, factually, really, understandably, rationally, morally, logically, and knowingly: there is a demand for someone to pick up a shovel and start working.

Why don't those millions of people pick up shovels and beat anyone blocking their path to the food senseless?

Why don't those millions of people pick up shovels and start growing food?

There is a lack of power, but it isn't Jobs, there are plenty of Jobs, so long as one person, anywhere, is starving to death, there is work to do, someone who will do anything, or nearly anything, to get some food, a clear, obvious, measurable, demand for food - at least.

Water, how about water, how about anywhere, anyplace, where there is a demand for clean, healthy, life sustaining, water?

No jobs?

That is a Patented Absurdity.

What is obviously, measurably, missing, is knowledge. Knowledge is scarce, and scarce beyond measure, when many people are both unemployed and starving at the same time on the same planet where anything can be transported from one place on Earth to the other side of the Planet in less than the time it takes a person to starve to death.

You may not be grasping the full meaning of this, and there are ways to move to a full understanding. Consider your dearest loved one being somewhere starving, and know then that you have work to do, you have a job to do, and that is the POINT.

If you think that there are people taking care of such things, going around finding starving people, and feeding them, helping them, and doing good things, then sure that is a nice thought, but by God, what the Hell is in their way?

How about, for example, the Red Cross?

Can you read?

Item A, part of a two part System

Item B, the second part of the two part System

Go to where that report reports on The Red Cross (the parts of the Red Cross that "get's in the way", in a big way).

Here
W. B. Thompson, Red Cross Donor, Believes Party Misrepresented. New York, Feb. 2 (1918). William B. Thompson, who was in Petrograd from July until November last, has made a personal contribution of $1,000,000 to the Bolsheviki for the purpose of spreading their doctrine in Germany and Austria.
Some people have taken on the work of naming names while following the money through history, piecing the puzzle together.

What is afoot now, and not by accident, may not yet curdle your blood, causing you to bolt up ridged in bed, from a deep sleep, overwhelmed by a clear and present danger, shocking you into a present awareness of immediate clarity in perception, as you can hear the torture victims beside you screaming, knowing that your dearest loved one's are next in line on the table, and then you are next.

Why not?

Why not now, why put it off until it there is no way to avoid it?

Like it or not, it is afoot, and it is coming to a Theater Near YOU

How small is the planet Earth?

Moving onto other sources:

Why does it not make perfect sense?

This is completely amazing. At the same time that the U.S. is warning Iran, the U.S. is doing everything in its power to prevent anyone from buying oil from Iran. It's a damn financial block of the strait by the U.S, that is really pushing Iran into a corner.
The idea driving the power to deceive and destroy, by any of those who are on the top of that power structure, is to cause World War III to escalate. World War III has already started, for some time now, and the idea is to deceive and destroy as much as is inhumanly possible, and then be in a position of power to pick up the pieces.

It is called The Business Cycle. If you do not understand it, you won't make sense of what is happening, and you will be victim to it, and you will be supporting it, as your power to defend against it is used to make it so.

Not an accident

That is a record of how well the plan is moving towards the desired goal.

It is a Patented Absurdity to "believe" that those who are profiting from it are working toward ending it, fixing it, repairing it, to the interest, and benefit, of the victims.

A.
Those people running the show say we are broke while they drive off on vacation to one of their many mansions around the Globe, and they are doing their best to fix this problem.

B.
Those people running the show, who say we are broke, while they drive off on vacation to one of their many mansions around the Globe, are too stupid to fix the problem.

Blame me if it makes you feel better?

Update

"Well, what if some guy's in a comma, and...uh...he's going to die and he never took out insurance. What should happen?"

Well, his first answer was something like, "It's a tribute to our liberty."

Chomsky is a Left Gate Keeper, and here is the second instance of that choice he makes to side with falsehood instead of choosing to adhere to principle.

The first instance involves Chomsky dismissing the subject of 911 as an inside job perpetrated by insiders, as a false flag, so as to bring about enough support for another war.

Note too that Ron Paul is a Right Gate Keeper, siding with Chomsky on the 911 issue, if only as a case of omission, if not an overt falsification of the facts.

As to this present instance of falsification of the facts by Chomsky, it is unlikely, since Chomsky is a very intelligent person, having one of the most extensive concept of language of any human being alive, and his comments appear to be based upon an obvious misunderstanding of principle.

I'm not suggesting that a Noam Chomsky for president would be worse, in any way, than a Ron Paul as president, both would be completely opposite the Legal Criminal default person, the endless parade of criminals hired to commit crimes with the power taken and abused by that office since, well, the first example of Washington, with at least that incident that became known as Shays's Rebellion.

What I am saying is that Noam Chomsky resorts to falsification of the facts by basing his comments on his misunderstanding of Ron Paul's well communicated principled positions. In effect what Noam Chomsky does is to create a false Ron Paul, according to Noam Chomsky's own invention of what Ron Paul says, and then, suddenly, that false creation of Ron Paul is, according to Noam Chomsky, guilty of all the bad things that Noam Chomsky has invented about Ron Paul

In this case, if I am not mistaken, the concept of a Democratic Federated Republican form of government empowers the Federal employees, or elected officers if you prefer that term, to accomplish a few, enumerated tasks, and to do no more than that, and if The People want more from their governments they have their State governments to hire, or elect, to accomplish those additional goals.

If Noam Chomsky does not understand that, then I'll eat my hat. He must be choosing to lie, to distort, to falsify, and to demonize Ron Paul for some other reason hidden, or, there is something the Noam Chomsky knows that is not known by me concerning Ron Paul.

I've watched the debates and each time someone asks Ron Paul about any question concerning what the Federal Government PEOPLE are elected to do, Ron Paul stand firmly on the principled position of LIMITED Government on the Federal Level, and from my understanding of Ron Paul's position he, and I, both know that one State within a Democratic Federated Republican form of government that begins to promise every conceivable "benefit" that The People want will be the least powerful State in the Union as all the Honest Productive People who are taxed to pay for all those "benefits" walk to a less Despotic State.

Again, that is not to say that Noam Chomsky's ideal government set-up would be any different than Ron Pauls ideal government set-up, but one of the two is in a position to move in the right direction, and the other one isn't. One is doing just talking, and the other one is doing the walking.

By "right direction" I do not mean the opposite of the "left direction", instead, I mean to move further away from legal crime and further toward Liberty, which is right, but only right from a moral viewpoint whereby the definition of moral is based upon the concept that life is good, life is worth living, and life, any life, is worth preserving if possible. The other direction is easy to know, since it is merely deceit and aggressive violence, or willful employment of power toward the goal of injuring innocent people for profit - or just for fun.

If Noam Chomsky is right about Ron Paul, and I'm wrong, then that fact is not well communicated, not competitively communicated, not scientifically communicated, not explained with language or any other medium sufficient to arrive at a reasonable conclusion.

I would ask of both Ron Paul and Noam Chomsky to describe their vision of ideal money, and from that beginning I can find out which one is resorting to lies, or which one is merely ignorant.

I can ask anyone the same question to arrive at the same goal. What is idea money? Give it a try. Make my day, and if you can't be serous about the answer, then is there anything serious in existence to you?