 |
PM |  | |
Quote | | |
Reply | | |
Full Topic | |
| Joined: | Mon Nov 21st, 2005 |
| Location: | California USA |
| Posts: | 6399 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
| Mana: |    |
Liberty Day happens, nothing wrong with that, unless you depend upon crime to exist.
The eastern world it is explodin',
violence flarin', bullets loadin',
you're old enough to kill but not for votin',
you don't believe in war, what's that gun you're totin',
and even the Jordan river has bodies floatin',
but you tell me over and over and over again my friend,
ah, you don't believe we're on the eve of destruction.
Don't you understand, what I'm trying to say?
Can't you see the fears that I'm feeling today?
If the button is pushed, there's no running away,
There'll be no one to save with the world in a grave,
take a look around you, boy, it's bound to scare you, boy,
and you tell me over and over and over again my friend,
ah, you don't believe we're on the eve of destruction.
Yeah, my blood's so mad, feels like coagulatin',
I'm sittin' here, just contemplatin',
I can't twist the truth, it knows no regulation,
handful of Senators don't pass legislation,
and marches alone can't bring integration,
when human respect is disintegratin',
this whole crazy world is just too frustratin',
and you tell me over and over and over again my friend,
ah, you don't believe we're on the eve of destruction.
Think of all the hate there is in Red China
Then take a look around to Selma, Alabama!
Ah, you may leave here, for four days in space,
but when you return, it's the same old place,
the poundin' of the drums, the pride and disgrace,
you can bury your dead, but don't leave a trace,
hate your next-door-neighbour, but don't forget to say grace,
and you tell me over and over and over and over again my friend,
you don't believe we're on the eve of destruction.
no no you don't believe we're on the eve of destruction.
Too many words to read, I know, I know, we are all so busy working harder and harder to pay off that debt.
Or, as the case may be, collecting it.
You and what army.
Work harder, and harder, and harder, to give blood, as you turn to stone, or work harder, and harder, and harder to collect blood from stones. Wish in one hand, shit in the other, which one fills up first?
The game is rigged, and you are not on the winning side. You are one of the dupes, and if you are not one of the dupes, you have a few secrets, trade secrets, like where your power is flowing as The Dollar Hegemony crumble and then new regime emerges - getting out of dollar assets before it is too late, not wanting to be left holding that empty bag. Don't worry, I'm not interested in knowing those secrets.
Most people are paying off personal debt, so as to collect the collective debt, for those few who run that legal crime business.
Most are working harder, and harder, and harder, so as to pay a personal debt, which is collected by people who use that power to collect a collective debt, and if you don't understand how that works, perhaps you can get a clue, offered by someone in our not to distant past. Here:
Not so common
Society in every state is a blessing, but Government, even in its best state, is but a necessary evil; in its worst state an intolerable one: for when we suffer, or are exposed to the same miseries BY A GOVERNMENT, which we might expect in a country WITHOUT GOVERNMENT, our calamity is heightened by reflecting that we furnish the means by which we suffer.
Consuming your life so as to pay someone else for the privileged of life, so that someone else can use that power to collect from every sucker in the game that still plays the game, on the wrong end of the stick.
The parasite city is running out of hosts.
This Day is a potential Day of Liberty and so I offer two scenarios of thought as "what if" scenarios. For your consideration:
1. What if the Honest Productive People didn't lose the power of Liberty in 1788, what if Liberty instead of Despotism (Legal Crime) prevailed at that point in time?
2. What if the Honest Productive People regain the power of Liberty in 2012, what if Liberty instead of Despotism (Legal Crime) prevails on or before July 4th 2012?
In order to understand the answer to the number 1 scenario there has to be an accurate accounting done by the person doing the understanding concerning the balance of power between Liberty and Legal Crime at that time, in our not too distant history.
I will make this very short, even though a full accounting is anything but very short. To be as specific and as brief as possible I will simply declare a provable fact in the nature of that struggle between Liberty and Despotism (Legal Crime), if the criminals win, anything, they win control over their targeted victims. In 1788, for example, the criminals targeted any productive human being, seeking control over them, and they won, they gained that desired control, in short, the criminals made slavery legal.
You can claim otherwise, but the criminals wrote down their laws, where they make slavery legal, so they confess those crimes, with ink, on paper, all as legal as any other law obeyed by any human being who ever lived or is living, or will live.
Liberty lost, and the criminals won, when The Constitution was enforced by the criminals who used that enabling document to control their victims.
That is the brief, short, and the down dirty accounting, but these are already too many words for those who are now controlled, who have to work too hard just to make ends meet, so that their own, earned, power can then be siphoned off to enable more of the same control over more of the same victims, by more of the same criminals hiding behind a very thin veil of legal legitimacy.
The two part question here is "what if" that didn't happen then, in 1788, and "what if" the victims refuse to be victims anymore now, or soon? The brief, but accurate, account of the past is yours now, to have, to hold, and to reject at your continued peril, if that is your choice. If you can, for a brief span of time, entertain the idea that the brief account is true, then come along with me and imagine what could have been, since then, before moving onto what can be, instead of continuing the ponzi, pyramid, confidence, scheme, of Legal Crime.
Knowing the nature of legal crime can thereby help in the understanding of what would have been in a case where legal crime was no longer enforced, or enforceable, since Liberty prevails in that case. What won't happen, in Liberty, is the steady flow of power from those who are Honest and Productive to those who are Dishonest and Destructive, as that power weakens the Honest and Productive, and as that power strengthens the Dishonest and Destructive, to a point at which the Honest and Productive become measurably powerless, and the Dishonest and Destructive become all powerful.
Clueless?
What is a case where a victim of crime is so powerless as to be incapable of even knowing that the victim is a victim? What would that look like; what would that scenario look like, if such a state of affairs existed in reality?
A victim may, for example, send their own children to the criminals so as to have their own children return home and destroy everything in sight, or worse, to have their own children become criminal enforcers who collect more children, from your home, and from your neighbors home, to become criminal enforcers, collecting more children. What happens in one generation, in that case where the criminals have become all powerful?
Look around. How many people do you know are people who send their children off to aggressive wars for the profit of a very few, at the expense of everyone, as these aggressive wars for profit now threaten the existence of all life on earth.
Don't look around. Work instead. Work harder, look around less, if you are peeking. Send your children into the network of legal crime and risk that generation failing to know better, and failing to resist the powerful force that is immorality, and crime, and even legalized crime.
What if, I say, and you scoff?
What handy excuses leaps into your conscious mind, from whatever deep and dark abyss such things fester, as there can be no entertaining of such folly?
Here is where the tables turn, and the past is set aside, as lessons learned, or as folly defining itself, in real time; we, if you are willing, move onto "what if" number two.
In order to get even the least bit of control over the accurate answer concerning "what if" Liberty wins against Legal Crime in our future, near or far, it is a requirement to know what is happening now.
To that end I offer a few reports concerning things happening now.
State of the Criminal State Address
But here is the second part of the equation that adds up to definite criminality.
In the same story, the New York Times quotes US Defence Secretary Leon Panetta making what should be a startling admission: that Iran does not have a nuclear weapons.
Panetta says: “Are they [Iran] trying to develop a nuclear weapon? No.”
What if
What if the legal criminals knew that their victims here in this land had finally had enough, and what if we, here, invented, and produced, and maintained our own schedule of pulling that plug that is the connection between The Honest Productive People here, and those Legal Criminals in Wall Street, or Washington, or on vacation in whichever paradise they own?
Or control
You are ready with excuses, of course you are, since there can be none of that superfluous "what if" stuff, other than: what if I run out of money to pay my debts.
Of course
Of course
A horse is a horse
Of course
Brink of destrution?
I am not the one.
I am not the one, and only one, causing the bad news, so try, try, try, to resist the urge to shoot the messenger, and when I get back up after being shot several times, as the messenger shooters grow tired, weary, and no longer able to shoot, and shoot, and shoot, the messenger, I can speak. I am the one who knows a way out, a simple way out, an easy way out, and it isn't rocket science. It is basic common sense. Not too tough. I'm not the one claiming that there is no way out, and I'm not the one who is fixing the information to fit the hypothesis, to prove something by altering the facts, omitting facts.
I'm not the one explaining how rain happens, according to my thesis, just so long as I disregard the existence of clouds.
Doom and Gloom is Fear Mongering, a control tool, a stick, a weapon, and in the hands of a criminal, what do you think will be the net result?
Clueless?
Here is a clue
Pay
There is no other choice. No way out. And you think it's me, don't you, come on, be honest, you think it is me. I'm the one. Admit it. Well, I've got news for you. It is not me. The Legal Criminals confess, and they are in your fucking faces confessing. You don't believe me, I know, I know, so read their own official confessions, and then continue to not know. Send your children off to be revenuers too. Pay the personal debt, so as to finance the collection of the collective debt. It is a rat race, and guess who is winning. Guess what happens at the finish line, racing to the bottom.
Confessions of Legal Crime Inc.
Section 4.
The validity of the public debt of the United States, authorized by law, including debts incurred for payment of pensions and bounties for services in suppressing insurrection or rebellion, shall not be questioned.
Pay, don't even think about not paying. Obey, pay, obey, it is a need to know basis.
You don't need to know. Knowing is against the law, don't you know.
Don't believe me, ask the authorities. They know, and they let you know they know, if you can still read, before that falls off from disuse too. Atrophy.
And to close out:
I am most certainly not the only one
#10) Ron Paul wants to criminally investigate the crooks in Washington