 |
PM |  | |
Quote | | |
Reply | | |
Full Topic | |
| Joined: | Mon Nov 21st, 2005 |
| Location: | California USA |
| Posts: | 6399 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
| Mana: |    |
Liberty Day is a process reaching a specific goal.
One goal is to be disconnected from Legal Criminals by July 4th 2012 by inventing, producing, employing, and maintaining a competitive legal money in place of the fraudulent dollar issue.
Another goal is to be disconnected from the harmful effects of arrogant ignorance. To be ignorant is one thing, but to be arrogant about being ignorant is the weapon of mass destruction that leads to all the other weapons of mass destruction as the Legal Criminals invent, produce, employ, and maintain arrogance imposed upon the victims, as the victims remain, and defend, ignorance.
Example:
Arrogant ignorance test 1.
That is a test of your ignorance concerning one thing that has become a measure of common ignorance. How many people are willing to defend their ignorance of fluoride and do so arrogantly, to a point whereby fluoride is still poisoning millions of people?
The answer is: more than one person, but only one counts.
There is a scene in the movie Erin Brockovich where an arrogant and ignorant person drinks some water and the main character in the movie suggests that the water may be poisoned.
Special water
Knowing something, beyond a shadow of doubt, is an individual thing, and it is not the property of someone else.
Dictators assume authority of knowing what other people know.
How does that work out in your mind? I may be able to shed some light. Suppose there are two groups of people, one group is honest and productive and they produce things that help people and they have a common goal to avoid producing things that hurt innocent people, and that group can be called any name such as a government, company, family, church, corporation, guild, coop, commune, or fried chicken - the name is only a name.
Then, another group exists, and that group is only honest as far as communication internal to the group, while they have no such goal of being honest to their victims, since they are not in agreement of the need to avoid harming innocent people, the opposite is true, they, their group, by any name that is attached to them, have the common goal of gaining at the expense of innocent victims.
One group can be called group A.
One group can be called group B.
A person who volunteers to join one group can do so at any time, all that the person needs to do is change the goal from gaining things, producing things, while avoiding doing harm to innocent people to - change that to - willfully gaining at the expense of innocent people.
The person in question may have that moment of "change" sneak up on them as they exist on one group and then suddenly they realize that they have crossed over into the other group as they become fully aware of the injuries that they are causing to innocent people.
That is called a rude awakening, and it isn't pretty.
Example:
Don't drink if you think it might hurt you.
Some things are inevitable.
The common denominator is a connection between group A and group B whereby the victimized group is made to believe in the need to send their power to the criminal group, to "provide the means by which we suffer", and once that belief is secure the victims will defend that connection with their lives. Too bad huh?