View single post by Joe Kelley
 Posted: Fri Mar 2nd, 2007 11:42 am
PM Quote Reply Full Topic
Joe Kelley

 

Joined: Mon Nov 21st, 2005
Location: California USA
Posts: 6399
Status: 
Offline
Mana: 
I am as serious about taking office as the possibility exists; therefore - my maintenance of this site will tend to be directed here at campaign central.

Campaign slogan:

I am not evil - honest to God.

http://www.lewrockwell.com/chu/chu16.html

Can we really expect officials who are part of such a criminal enterprise not to perceive each other as members of the same pack of wolves, and us, the taxpayers, as members of the same flock of sheep?

A quiz for the voting public: Who wrote the following best seller book in American history?

Society in every state is a blessing, but Government, even in its best state, is but a necessary evil; in its worst state an intolerable one: for when we suffer, or are exposed to the same miseries BY A GOVERNMENT, which we might expect in a country WITHOUT GOVERNMENT, our calamity is heightened by reflecting that we furnish the means by which we suffer. Government, like dress, is the badge of lost innocence; the palaces of kings are built upon the ruins of the bowers of paradise. For were the impulses of conscience clear, uniform and irresistibly obeyed, man would need no other lawgiver; but that not being the case, he finds it necessary to surrender up a part of his property to furnish means for the protection of the rest; and this he is induced to do by the same prudence which in every other case advises him, out of two evils to choose the least. Wherefore, security being the true design and end of government, it unanswerably follows that whatever form thereof appears most likely to ensure it to us, with the least expense and greatest benefit, is preferable to all others.


Campaign slogan:

I am not smarter than some 5th graders; but I know how to spell Iran and Iraq.


For those who read:

http://atimes.com/atimes/others/trade-war.html

http://www.antiwar.com/chu/c112699.html

 American moves to "contain" China will however have the perverse effect of delaying China's political liberalization. A Beijing unthreatened by western hegemony is prepared to allow considerably more freedom of domestic political expression than a Beijing which perceives foreign colonialists poised to take advantage of China in the event increased political freedom leads to widespread chaos. China remembers only too clearly what fate almost befell her during the late Ching dynasty, when internal disarray almost led to China's permanent partition by opportunistic Japanese, European and American imperialists. 
 

I think that sums things up.

 



 



Last edited on Fri Mar 2nd, 2007 12:34 pm by Joe Kelley