 |
PM |  | |
Quote | | |
Reply | | |
Full Topic | |
| Joined: | Mon Nov 21st, 2005 |
| Location: | California USA |
| Posts: | 6399 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
| Mana: |    |
Liberty Day will be, on that day.
Honest Productive Americans,
I happened upon a very well acted play written by a good author and the title is The Sunset Limited. You may see value in it, if you too can stumble upon it, or find it on your own.
Inspiration to communicate comes in many forms, so many as to defy an accurate account, like seconds of time in the span of time. I can guess. You can guess.
Counting on math helps, but not without a principle.
This may be a form of ranting to some, and to others this may be helpful. I can guess too.
Suppose that one and one is two.
Simple?
What if the person doing the counting was born with crossed eyes like me? I can fetch a picture if you doubt. The doctor who fixed my crossed eye's had had enough of life and he did something very odd, to me, but obviously not odd enough to him, he drank DRANO as a way out.
What is the worst way out? I can guess. How about you?
Suppose that the cross eyes accountant never fixes the cross eyed condition and every time he can see one thing it appears to be two things, and he knows it, and therefore he can count on math too?
One plus one is two is one (two) plus one ((two) is two (four).
That may be way too complicated for someone without crossed eyes, but not for someone who can translate, a go between, someone with the key to unlock the disparity of language.
You see one. You say one.
Cross eyed Joe sees two, knowing it is one, always one, but the word told to Joe is two, so Joe says two.
Who is confused?
Math can be counted on, under certain conditions.
What happens if Joe does not know any better and what happens if Joe is cross eyed one second, or one minute, and the very next minute Joe is no longer cross eyed, and Joe does not know this change in the perception Joe can see.
One is one one minute.
One is two the next minute.
Who can translate the things Joe is counting?
Can math still be counted on when one can be one or two at any given moment in time?
The point is to point out, again, that deception does not work on the deceiver, it works for the deceiver, at least while the deceiver can avoid becoming victim to the deception too.
That is one point.
Is that two points?
Is that the same point as saying that life is good, and therefore worth repeating, turning one into two?
No, it is not, according to the way Joe can see, and you can see too.
Do we see the same thing?
Is it one thing?
Life
Why invent death, produce it, and maintain it, when such folly is such a demonstrable lie?
Under certain conditions math can be counted on. I'm one who is counting the days until Liberty Day because I still can.