 |
PM |  | |
Quote | | |
Reply | | |
Full Topic | |
| Joined: | Mon Nov 21st, 2005 |
| Location: | California USA |
| Posts: | 6399 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
| Mana: |    |
I think Alex is working at this very thing, it seems to me anyway, that he is obviously trying to tone down the interruptions. There is also a consideration that has to do with LIVE discussions whereby something that is obvious to Alex may not be obvious to the listener, something having to do with the subject matter, something said by the caller, something that triggers a thought by Alex that is specific to the subject, and specific to the words spoken by the caller, but not something detected by the radio listener, as if for example, but not the only example, the caller pushes one of Alex's buttons, and not necessarily a willful intent upon the caller, to push Alex's buttons.
Alex may have just read something, or heard something, about the topic, and the urge to interrupt is momentarily overwhelming, for Alex, despite, what seems obvious to me, a huge effort on Alex's part to avoid interrupting.
Suppose, for example, that Alex was invited to a political debate, and the smooth talking politicians, and the smooth talking presstitutes work the tactic of pushing Alex's buttons to make him react emotionally, and suppose that this happens so as to see why it is not the best idea to interrupt people, not because it is bad to be emotional, but because the effect is tyrannical, or dictatorial, as if what Alex has to say is more important, to Alex, than what the caller has to say.
People, or sheeple, are afraid of emotional people who may threaten their slumber, and the Legal Criminals know this, and they use this, and they have a lot of science behind this, as the Legal Criminals manipulate their victims.
Alex Jones, as far as I can tell, doesn't speak to the sheeple, why bother?
If he ran for office, and the slimy presstitutes tried pushing his buttons, who would be afraid of Alex Jones if Alex Jones fought back, with emotion?
See what I mean?
On a very basic level there are two types of people.
A.
Those who are victims and criminals, one is the other, and they need someone telling them what to think and what to do, and once they have their orders they can then follow those orders, and they can be belligerent about following those orders if they are told to be belligerent. Might makes right, that is their creed. Something for nothing is their slogan. Falsehood is their staple diet. They live, eat, breath, and drink one way communication, dictatorship, absolute unquestioned obedience, and lies.
B.
Those who seek something better, higher quality, and lower cost, and we know that our own perspective is weak without competition from other viewpoints, standing on the shoulders of giants, so as to find the best viewpoint sooner, and therefore we listen, and if we speak we do so because our viewpoint challenges what may, or many not be, an inferior viewpoint, no matter who speaks the competitive viewpoint up for consideration by all who will listen.
Few people spell these things out as well as I do, so far as I know, as yet. I stopped reading from the script awhile ago.
You can offer a competitive viewpoint, and I will listen.
Who won't?
Who tells you that you are wrong? Who demands that you confess your error? Who imposes their superior viewpoint upon you?
The slimey people, the master/slave types, use lies to confuse the two types above, and that works well to accomplish two things as follows:
The master/slave types appear to be better by close confusion with the liberated types, since the shine of the liberated types, by that confusion, makes the master/slave types look better.
That is why, for example, the slimy Rick Perry is parroting the things spoken by Ron Paul. The shiny illumination of truth expressed by Ron Paul is stolen by the lies regurgitated by Rick Perry, and that confusion adds power to Rick Perry, if the viewer confuses the two, or is victim to the lie.
That is one of the two things accomplished by confusing the two groups.
The other goal is to make the liberated group ugly by close association with the master slave group, to make the two seem like one, by confusion, weakens the liberated group, as the mud sticks, so to speak.
An example of this is the offering of a supposed situation whereby Alex Jones is running for office and the slimy master/slave types push his buttons in a televised "live" debate, where they get to edit the final product of that broadcast. They push his buttons, Alex responds in kind, exposing the lies, and even being emotional about it, and that tactic does not work on the liberate group, but that tactic can work on people who are as yet not firmly in one group or the other, and that tactic is used to reinforce the lies that are firmly held as truth by the master/slave group sheeple.
They can call Alex Jones: Hitler, and what happens?
A.
The sheeple get the message, and now they call Alex Jones: Hitler, on command, and until they are told to call Alex Jones: Jesus, at which time that is the lie they will pretend to believe, or make believe.
B.
Those on the fence are presented with a choice, to move closer into the false master/slave closed loop group or move further away, and therefore closer into the liberated group, by their own power of accurate perception, and their own power of will to judge the evidence presented to them, at that time, so far as they still have command of that power.
C.
Those in the liberated group fully understand what is going on, as the master/slave group use lies to accomplish their goals of destroying all that is good in life.
Try not to be afraid to speak your mind, and try not to apologize in advance for doing so, because all that is part of the false world constructed by the Legal Criminals, or, if you wish, do as you please.
I try not to read from the script. You, as far as I am concerned, are as welcome to do so, at your liberty.
It is obvious to me that you are not someone who threatens liberty, and therefore, as far as I can tell, you are on the side of liberty.