 |
PM |  | |
Quote | | |
Reply | | |
Full Topic | |
| Joined: | Mon Nov 21st, 2005 |
| Location: | California USA |
| Posts: | 6399 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
| Mana: |    |
08-28-2011
Be Challenged
Liberty Day can be
07-04-2012
Honest Productive Americans,
The shared understanding of a dire necessity is the defining of polarization against the power of crime that is made legal, as the victims wake up, and begin the process of realization.
This process can be seen on a scale from abject obedience to falsehood on one end of the scale, and on the other end of the scale, or stick, is someone, somewhere, who represents near perfect knowledge.
Can it be understood that those who profit the most from the invention, production, and maintenance of these crimes, that are made legal, are those who are most likely closer, and closest to near perfect knowledge concerning the very things they invent, and the very things they produce, and the very things that they maintain?
The process works along the scale as the victims fall victim to the lies, and their power to resist weakens, and they fall deeper, and deeper, into the abyss, and are tangled more, and more, within the web of deceit, moving closer and closer to the far end, the stinky end, the point whereby they begin to represent those who pay the most, and receive the least, on that scale.
What is the process by which someone can work to move away from being a victim and move toward being less of a victim?
There are many processes, and I can generalize two as follows:
1.
If you can't beat' em: Join' em (the option that is not an option, it is blind obedience to falsehood)
2.
Get off that stick (liberty is the total measure of all the options that are not on the first non-option on this list of options)
Setting aside the first option, which is the option that perpetuates the business cycle, or the closed loop, or legal crime, or business as usual, or as it perpetuates the master/slave social network, I can move onto the second option.
The victims are polarized to be victims, or to be those who target and then exploit victims, and that can be seen as a power struggle, where victims are dumfounded, stupefied, and sent further, and further, down the smelly end of the stick, as the victims are rendered powerless against victimization, as the numbers, and masses, of victims are fighting each other, or in other ways not polarized to invent, produce, and get off that stick as one union of fed up victims, and within that closed loop, a few stronger victims, are polarized to "become that which we (supposedly) abhor", to become victimizer as the only option other than being a victim.
1.
If you can't beat' em: Join' em
Setting aside that closed loop, of having only two choices, one being the lesser of two evils; to either be a victim, or to be a victimizer, there can be as many other options as there are electrons in the known universe, or seconds in the expanse of all time.
2.
Get off that stick
Once the victims, and those who decide that being a victimizer is better than being a victim, understand, in unison, that those choices are false choices, they can begin to look for alternatives.
Once they begin that process, the alternative option begins to materialize as a very distant source of light, so distant as to almost be imperceptible, a faint spark in the darkness of falsehood.
Once that first distant spark is perceived, each individual will then be polarized to it, for an instant, for a first moment of truth; where it was, what it was, and will it become visible again, and in that process there is a time span.
The spark became visible.
That happened once, or that will happen soon, for the first time.
The person perceiving the initial spark, the first realization that options exist, the first glimpse of a human condition that is no longer either victim or victimizer, and then a reaction occurs.
If the reaction is not a knee jerk reaction, not a behavioral modification conditioned response, where the person perceives the spark, through an opening door, and the reaction is not to slam the door shut, the person may be polarized to desire, or have a self-interest in, knowing more, seeking that spark of light once again.
The spark becomes visible.
The door is slammed shut, or there is an internal awareness of a dire need to know the full measure of that spark.
Those who don't slam the door shut, and those who realize the need to know the full measure of that spark, which is a beginning perception of options away from the victim loop, are thereby polarized away from that which is the road to doom day, breaking the closed loop, defeating the conditioned response.
The door does not open toward a way out, it is not an escape route, because those perceptions belong in that closed loop cycle, on that stick, where victims and victimizers struggle to choose between the lesser (or greater) of two evils, and the true measure of that spark, once it begins to take shape, is a way forward, going forward, not a way out, backing out of something, it is a goal, the goal is not to leave, the goal is a future place, in time, and it is only a way out incidentally.
When will that day of Liberty occur?
Why not set a date?
What will happen on that day of Liberty?
Obvious things will happen on that day of Liberty. Victims will no longer be providing the means by which they suffer.
Why not set a date?
What holds you back?
What is the cause of self-censorship?
I can't answer that last question, I'm no longer self-censored.
I can guess within the sounds of silence.
You fear?