 |
PM |  | |
Quote | | |
Reply | | |
Full Topic | |
| Joined: | Mon Nov 21st, 2005 |
| Location: | California USA |
| Posts: | 6399 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
| Mana: |    |
I hear Alex speak of being labeled as a "Conspiracy Theorist" and then Alex says that he is proud to wear that title, or some such words expressing the concept.
I want to teach Alex Jones a lesson about this false label stuff, and I will use history to convey, or illustrate, the process of false labels, I will use the example of the Anti-Federalists; who were the "Conspiracy Theorists" of the day, back in the days before the Legal Criminals (or Globalists, or Elite, or whatever term works for you, so long as you accurately identify the planers and the executors of the global take over by way of legal monopoly money extortion fraud); before the Legal Criminals threw out the working experimental Federated Democratic Republic (enforcing peaceful, voluntary, and welcome competition among separate and sovereign States), and before the Legal Criminals ushered in their criminal dictatorship, Nation State, Consolidated Government, enabled into law by The Constitution fraud, in that time period, the Anti-Federalists were the modern day "Conspiracy Theorists" and one of them, a vocal member of that Conspiracy Theory group, was a man named Patrick Henry.
Patrick Henry was a "Conspiracy Theorist" of his day; the false label of that day was "Anti-Federalist".
Patrick Henry speaks for himself (better than I can by a wide margin):
http://www.constitution.org/afp/phenry00.htm
Right now, coincidentally, Alex Jones is interviewing someone who is offering American History. Will Alex Jones, and anyone Alex Jones interviews, ever expose the true nature of The Constitution, as Patrick Henry, one of histories famous "Conspiracy Theorists", did, in his speeches in opposition to The Constitution fraud.
Know this much:
You are labeled exactly the opposite of what you are by the people who steal your money power, your power to produce surplus wealth is stolen from you by the same people who invent, and then propagate the false labels attached to you, and the modern example is "Conspiracy Theorist". The past example was "Anti-Federalist".
For the crime of questioning the common, popular, and fashionable, theories of conspiracy, you are labeled the opposite of what you intend to accomplish.
If you oppose the official tendency to stop the process of finding out who actually commits crimes, and if you oppose the official tendency to excuse the failure to actually expose the criminals who commit crimes by claiming that the crimes are perpetrated by a nebulous, mysterious, unknown "Conspiracy Theory", then you are labeled a "Conspiracy Theorists" for your effort to expose the folly of "Conspiracy Theory".
You want to know the truth, you question the "official" version of the truth, which is a true conspiracy theory, you question the validity of the official theory of conspiracy, you question the official version of the truth, which is a theory of conspiracy, and you are blamed for that very thing, as you are somehow, by some power, given, the name "Conspiracy Theory", and that mud, thrown on you, sticks, with some power of glue.
Got that?
Here comes the History lesson, for you, given to you, by me, since I did my home work, and you did not.
During the time period between British oppression and America defense a number of honest productive people fled Britain and began prospering in America, and to do so they invented their own money, called Stamp Script, and they began to experiment with governments fashioned after such things as Magna Carte (with Trial by Jury = each legal person has the power to veto any law) and a Republic, such as the model offered by the Swiss.
Ask: How can the Swiss avoid World War I and World War II while those wars where perpetrated all around that working Republic?
During that time period when honest productive Americans began an experimental Federated Democratic Republic the Legal Criminals from Britain invaded America so as to enforce their despotism upon the honest productive American people, to enslave them, to take the surplus wealth created by them, and then to use that power against them.
Like this:
http://www.ushistory.org/paine/commonsense/sense2.htm
Break: I'll quote and continue after reporting that Alex Jones' guest is speaking about England and their spies. Did you know that Alexander Hamilton, one of the men behind the move to create The Constitution, and one of the men exposed by the "Anti-Federalists" (like Patrick Henry) was accused of being an agent for the British Monarchy, and, on top of that Alexander Hamilton confesses, openly, a preference for a Monarchy over the less dictatorial Federated Democratic Republic.
Society in every state is a blessing, but Government, even in its best state, is but a necessary evil; in its worst state an intolerable one: for when we suffer, or are exposed to the same miseries BY A GOVERNMENT, which we might expect in a country WITHOUT GOVERNMENT, our calamity is heightened by reflecting that we furnish the means by which we suffer.
So, in that time period, between British rule, and the ratification of The Constitution, a time existed when America was governing itself within an enabling document called The Articles of Confederation, and that power, that American power, with the help of the French, defeated, and drove out, the largest military power on the planet, and it did so with an all volunteer Army. It did that with Separate and Sovereign States within a voluntary (States can join or separate voluntarily) Union under The Articles of Confederation.
In that time period the Nationalists hatched a plan to seize dictatorial control over all the Separate and Sovereign States, and usher in Dictatorship by way of an enforced money monopoly power. Alexander Hamilton was one of the Nationalists pushing that plan into effect. In order to get away with that fraud the Nationalists had to hide themselves behind a false front. The Nationalists chose, and then hid behind, the false front of Federalism. The Nationalists called themselves Federalists.
Do you understand that history so far? The Nationalists, seeking dictatorial powers over all the Separate and Sovereign States, and seeking a legal money monopoly power, could not get away with their crime, if they openly, and publicly, confessed that they were Nationalists, and they could not get away with that crime if they confessed that they were planning to enforce a legal money monopoly power, so, they claimed that they were Federalists.
Got that?
Why did they claim that they were Federalists?
They claimed that they were Federalists because the concept of federalism was the government of choice at the time, a Federated Democratic Republic was as voluntary as a government could be at the time, and it was a form of government that made use of competition between Separate and Sovereign State governments, whereby one State growing more dictatorial would find their tax payers voting with their feet and moving to other Separate and Sovereign States within the voluntary Federated Democratic Republic, and the concept works, is proven to work, at that time, with specific examples of how it works, such as Shays's Rebellion as one shinning example of how it works.
There is much more to how it works, including the concept of Trial by Jury, and other things, things addressed by Patrick Henry, at the time, as Patrick Henry tried to expose the Nationalists, as Patrick Henry tried to lift the thin cloak of false Federalism, and Patrick Henry tried to champion Federalism.
So, do you have that understood up to this point, and if so, guess what the Nationalists did to people like Patrick Henry, and all those who opposed Nationalism; what did the Nationalists (hiding behind a false front of Federalism) do to the Federalists who opposed the Nationalists?
Are you out of guesses?
The Nationalists, who were promising Federalism to the gullible massive mobs of the majority, were being exposed by the actual Federalists, and so, the Nationalists ran a false advertisement campaign, and they invented another false label, and they effectively inspired the gullible massive mobs of the majority to attach that false label to the actual Federalists who opposed the Nationalists, and that false label is:
Anti-Federalists.
Do you see the connection yet?
Today a "Conspiracy Theorist" is a person who is against the official conspiracy theories, for many reasons that a person may become against the official conspiracy theory, a person does become against the official conspiracy theory, and once a person does become against the official conspiracy theory, that person who has become against the official conspiracy theory is then labeled, by some mysterious power of falsehood, a "Conspiracy Theorist" for becoming against the official conspiracy theory.
Got that?
If you become aware of the fact that the official conspiracy theory is false, or could be false, or could be less than accurate, you will then set out in opposition of blind belief in that official conspiracy theory, and for that, for that turn of events in your life, you will then be labeled a "Conspiracy Theorist".
Got that?
What is the historical president?
If you were living in the time period between the prosperous American revolution and The Constitution and you became aware of the crimes being perpetrated by the Nationalists hiding behind a false front of Federalism, and you then began to support Federalism in opposition to Nationalism, you would have then been labeled an Anti-Federalist, and that label would stick up to today.
Today, we are taught, that the "Founding Fathers" created a Republic with The Constitution, when, in fact, the opposite was perpetrated.
What do you call me, for the crime of delivering the message to you?
You can call me Anti-Constitution, or an Anti-American who opposes The Constitution. Will that be true, half true, ignorant, or deliberately false if you do so.
What do I support, actually, and how can you know if you dictate to me that which I support, despite any effort on my part to keep your mud off of me, since I prefer not to have the mud you place on me stick to me?
The Constitution is what it is, and it enables that which people do, including such things as Suppressing Rebellions, such as the historical example offered by The Whiskey Rebellion.
The Constitution was used, by those who constructively interpreted it, because it was designed to be constructively interpreted, to create a legal monopoly bank, then another one, and then a better one in the form of The FED.
The Constitution was used, again by those who constructively interpreted it, to solve The Indian Problem, with that Final Solution, and the same enabling document was used to enforce Slavery, and the same enabling document was used to perpetrate The Civil War, as two competing criminal governments waged war over control of the honest productive victims of their separate and sovereign despotic forms of government - slaves on both sides. Different colors, same business as usual, business cycle, legal monopoly money enforcement fraud competitors, fighting over turf.
If it was a true Federated Democratic Republic it would not have allowed The Whiskey Rebellion, the people rebelling against the legal money monopoly fraud in Pennsylvania would not have had to face a conscripted Army run by the new Dictator as the new Dictator crushed "so fatal a Spirit" the same Spirit of 1776.
What is that power that enables a person who is against dictatorship, a person who is for liberty, whereby a person who becomes a supporter of liberty, and whereby a person who becomes against dictatorship, is then labeled with a label that is the exact opposite?
What is the measure of that power? What is the nature of that power? What is the character of that power? What is the constitution of that power? If you don't know, it is past time for you to know, failure to know is ignorance, but once you are asked, failure to know is willful ignorance, and considering the weight of the consequences for failing to know, I am informing you of the fact that willful ignorance at this point amounts to stupidity.
Stupid people are powerless against the power of falsehood, and all the costs that go with that mire.
Gather up enough stupid people into one network, so long as some of those stupid people can produce more than they consume, and once you do that, in your own mind's eye, measure the power that can be sucked out of that network, and if you have read this far, and if you have that pile of stupid people, working harder and harder, in your mind, and you begin to imagine the amount of power that can be sucked out of that network of hard working stupid people, when you got that, keep it in view long enough to look at the next link.
http://www.usdebtclock.org/