 |
PM |  | |
Quote | | |
Reply | | |
Full Topic | |
| Joined: | Mon Nov 21st, 2005 |
| Location: | California USA |
| Posts: | 6399 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
| Mana: |    |
Hi,
I started and stopped the REAL NEWS report above. I started it because I know that this is REAL NEWS. This topic cuts to the HEART of what I call legal crime. I stopped viewing the report at the beginning of the report so as to start this offering - this part of a possible discussion.
I'm an out-law, because I offer parts of discussions.
Discussion is effectively against the law.
REAL NEWS is also against the law, but REAL NEWS is an exception to that effective rule.
If falsehood, instead of discussion (or real news), was against the law, things would be different.
If violence (such as mass murder and torture) were against the law (which it isn't), things would be different.
Paul Jay (any relation to John Jay ?) opens the report by stating some facts, I see these facts as half true facts, but that is because I see things from a perspective that doesn't have the "Emperor has beautiful clothes on" filter working. I see congress as they are, mostly lying, cheating, torturing, and mass murdering criminals - who happen to have the power to do so legally - legal criminals - and therefore, my filter (a more accurate one since I see that the emperor is naked, the emperor doesn't have any clothes on whatsoever, not beautiful clothes, not fashionable clothes, no clothes what-so-ever), therefore the facts presented by Paul Jay, concerning the fight to end The Fed, are half true facts, when seen through the filters I employ.
I have competitive filters, not necessarily the best filters. Competition forces the quality of filters up, and competition forces the cost (or price) of filters down.
How much does it cost a person if a person uses the "emperor is wearing beautiful clothes" filters?
HereHere is a score card on that last question - and I'm going to return to the REAL NEWS.
I stopped viewing the report at the point where The New Deal is mentioned.
I can confirm eyewitness reports concerning the folly of The New Deal, from the perspective of an honest productive person, a person who produced economic power, and I can confirm by way of specific data, a money trail, that The New Deal was seen as a source of income, an effective confidence scheme, only for those people who did profit from that legal crime spree.
In other, more graphic, words:
The New Deal score card:
1. Honest product people paid for The New Deal and were tortured and mass murdered paying the price of The New Deal
2. Legal criminals, planning and then executing The New Deal, increased their income with that specific legal crime during it's reign of terror.
The paper trail of The New Deal includes the thing that became known as World War II.
If you think I am the one seeing our world through false filters, then we can put our competitive filters to the test, looking forward instead of backwards, we can drop this Real News Report, and look toward World War III, as The Dollar Hegemony faces competition focused currently on such places as Iran. We won't do that, because discussion is against the law, and my filter only challenges your filter in the sense that time will pass and the future facts will prove which filter is the higher quality filter - at the lower cost (price).
If World War III does happen, as World War II did happen, then legal crime will proceed as planned, and I'll know this fact. If World War III doesn't happen, then my money is on The FED bubble bursting.
No more of this:
Reset this back to zero
The Dollar Hegemony will cause World War III or the people running it will have to move their power to Asia and start over in Asia. In the land that once was America the people running The Dollar Hegemony will have no more power. What the honest productive people in the land that once was America do with the power they earn at that point, having avoided World War III, is anyone's guess. My money is on home grown power, Solar Panels, Electric Cars, CO2 eating Algae fuel, and Modular Greenhouse Vertical Farming - but that may just be me dreaming of utopia .
Back to the report by REAL NEWS with Paul Jay - for me.
I stopped at 8.03 in the video stream.
Before moving on I will offer an competitive example of this NEWS being propagated within this report on The FED.
My version is to take a different angle entirely. I am going to offer the reader a way to see how political economy works without all the falsehood.
Suppose that we turn back time to that time just before the the people running the money monopoly (The FED = legal criminals) caused the business cycle to go from upswing, to peak, and then into rapid downswing. You can see that any way you want, just know that "the economy" was booming and then "the economy" went bust, it did, and that is the main point.
From that point look at a possible plan and then a possible execution of the plan that could be set in motion now, and this plan could have been set in motion back then right when "the economy" crashed.
The plan (to allow the reader to see things more clearly by offering a competitive viewpoint = a different angle of view, not "the establishment" viewpoing):
The politically powerful people create two products and these two products are offered to anyone, in or out of, America.
Product 1:
A zero interest loan to anyone with a good credit rating (such as a FICO score) for a brand new home mortgage and/or a brand new (Newer Deal) business mortgage at zero percent interest.
Product 2:
A 1 percent interest loan to anyone buying Product 1, and this loan is strictly offered for power producing purchases; whereby the purchase is accurately measurable for its capability of producing more power.
An example:
Honest Joe working man, and Honest Jane working woman buy product 1 and lower their monthly payments by roughly half for their mortgage on their home.
Those two people also start a new business or if they already have a business, which is likely since they have a high FICO score, they cut their monthly business mortgage costs in half.
Now Honest Joe and Jane have more money every month as a result of product 1.
Joe and Jane also buy product 2 and they install Solar Panels at home and at the office and with that purchase they cut their utility costs down by roughly 10%, and that savings includes the additional cost of 1% interest payed out to The Newer Deal (the people producing, offering, selling, and maintaining products 1 and 2 = The Newer Deal).
Joe and Jane also use Product 2 to get 4 new electric cars and by doing that they save 80% on transportation fuel costs. One of their old cars was not yet paid for so the savings in interest in that old loan, from a high interest car loan rate, to a 1% Newer Deal loan rate, amounts to more money in Joe and Jane's bank each month added to the Newer Deal transportation fuel savings.
Joe and Jane then hatch a plan to pay for the other 3 new Electric cars by starting a taxi business and hiring their son and daughter to drive people around town charging less money compared to the current taxi service, since the current taxi service is still paying high transportation fuel costs.
Now, dear reader, you have something real to think about when thinking about what the politicians (the ones who have control over the power of money creation) can or cannot do in reality - in simple terms, real terms, facts, home grown facts, real reality, on a silver platter. I'll pretend that someone thanks me for this offering: you are welcome.
Back to Paul Jay - for me.
I see a very serous need to call for a reality check at the point where anyone pretends that the Federal Reserve governors, the actual people having the legal license to create dollars, has a mandate at all, never mind the cartoon mandate of reducing inflation and/or decreasing unemployment - or any mandate whatsoever.
If the reader wants to cut through all those lies then my suggestion is for the reader to weight into any process of thought designed to know, truly, what the mandate is, for the Federal Reserve, and that suggestion is, for the reader to consider, is the elimination of competition. That is the mandate. All the other mandates are smoke and mirrors - falsehoods.
The Federal Reserve must destroy competition. That is a fact. Any competition removes the power held by the people running The Federal Reserve.
The Federal Reserve moves power from the many producers of power to the people running The Federal Reserve. That is not their mandate, that is just what they do, without any other explanation, reason, excuse, or whatnot, that is what they do, they have "the dollar", and that is what they do with the dollar.
The score card is right here:
Power moving from A to B in real time.
If you want to complicate the simple knowledge of what is happening into a confusing misunderstanding then I have to ask you why you want to do that, instead of seeing the facts as they exist in reality.
I'm going to return to the Real News report.
I see a need to clarify a point raised concerning "Ron Paul Types" as such:
The people who have the exclusive license to create legal (U.S.A.) money cause "The Business Cycle" by adding and subtracting legal money. That is what they do, not "some people think" they do, and not "Ron Paul Types" say that they do, that IS what they do, a proven fact - even a confessed fact.
To suggest otherwise adds to the cover up.
Back to the report - for me.
The Ron Paul versus Bush republican comment, where Ron Paul confessed being in support of Dennis Kucinich, more so than Bush republicans (known as Neoconservatives = "Crazies"), on unconstitutional wars of aggression for profit is common sense stuff - a litmus test.
Are you:
A. Willfully supporting mass murder and torture for profit
B. Not A
Some people are not A - at least 2 in the U.S. congress.