 |
PM |  | |
Quote | | |
Reply | | |
Full Topic | |
| Joined: | Mon Nov 21st, 2005 |
| Location: | California USA |
| Posts: | 6399 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
| Mana: |    |
Anyone,
Hopefully. Luckily for us human beings here inside of reality, the elimination of competition isn't possible. The only important question is whether they were using force to eliminate competition, or whether they were merely providing a better service.
The libeler and his or her apologist have invaded this thread to accomplish some goal they two share, perhaps. As to the actual data hidden between all the text that is designed to discredit a person, that person being me, so as to discredit what the person says, that would be the stuff I write, the data, quoted above, is again false.
The measure of power supporting the effort to eliminate competition can be easily found on bank accounts. How many competitors, for example, can compete with the U.S. National Debt?
http://www.brillig.com/debt_clock/
Back to the libelers "contribution" to the topic:
In context of the topic diversion (a welcome diversion from my point of view) the quote above is patently false.
the elimination of competition isn't possible.
No U.S. Debt exists in any other currency whatsoever. There is no X debt, no Y debt, and no Z debt, there is only the debt created by the people who monopolize (eliminate competition) the U.S. National Debt. They produce dollars. The debt is dollars. Someone has to come up with 11,914,164,651,660 dollars, plus some change, and that number is increasing fast.
In context, again, the offering from the libeler is patently false, measurably false, and the measure is easily measured.
Example two:
http://www.nationalpriorities.org/costofwar_home
The denomination, again, is the monopoly money, not X, not Y, and not Z currency. There is no competition for that power to create that power to purchase war, war that is employed to eliminate competition (both foreign and domestic), and the measure of effectiveness is absolute, in a measurable, traceable, documented sense.
Back to the libeler's contribution (as the libeler expends effort to eliminate the competition by conjuring up false publications):
Who has yet to answer that question? Why would a question that is already answered suddenly become the "only important" question? To who is that question the "only important" question and why is that person claiming that that is the "only important" question to anyone but the person doing the claiming?
The only important question is whether they were using force to eliminate competition, or whether they were merely providing a better service.
I think an important question is: How can innocent victims avoid being victimized by war mongers and libelers?
- Being tortured and then being murdered might be avoidable, so how can that be avoided?
- Being libeled might also be avoidable, so how can that be avoided?
Habits may transfer.
MODERATORS
I just don't see why you hate competition.
Please note the egregious example of libel above as the libeler continues to publish libel on your forum, this public access forum, this place that isn't free from people who volunteer to libel innocent people who volunteer to publish on this forum.
Who does this "fellow" forum member target with that quote above? Who does this "fellow" forum member mean to attack with that sentence? Who continually accesses libel as a means of eliminating competition?
Who hates competition? I do not hate competition; to publish that lie is to libel against me, again.
Please stop publishing such libelous falsehoods aimed at me on this public access forum. Please stop the continuous libel, please stop.
The aim of the competition I know, in context of this topic, the aim of productive competition is to provide the highest quality products at the lowest possible cost.
Or if you love it, why you hate its inherent aim: the attempt to eliminate other competition.
The aim of some other form of competition (not a form of competition that fits in context of this topic) may very well be to "eliminate other competition" in some way, "inherent" as the libeler claims.
What does that have to do with this topic?
Species A is in competition with species B for the last of a declining supply of vital resources. What happens? Species A destroys species B and survives.
That could be an example of planning on and following through with the plan to eliminate the competition by killing off the competitive species.
What does that have to do with this topic?
Team A is competing with team B for more points, so team A plans on attacking team B, going through team B, getting to the goal, and scoring a point or six.
What does that have to do with the competition that is in the context of this topic?
A supplier of money (accurate currency) doesn't have to raid the competition, torture them, kill them, and by that plan the supplier of money eliminates the competition - it is an elective plan, not at all necessary or produtive. The supplier of money can supply higher quality money at a lower cost instead. If competitor A isn't up to the task the competitor could find work where the competitor is up to the different task instead of resorting to the other type of "competition".
- The goal is to supply the highest quality product at the lowest cost and win by reaching that goal.
- The goal is to torture and mass murder all competitors and then be in a position to supply crap (inaccurate currency) at a high cost (debt reaching into the trillions and tortured bodies piling up into the millions).
The libeler has an ongoing discussion with his or her Straw-Man, perhaps, and the curious thing about that, to me, is why that argument spills into this thread.
We can only get constantly improving service, quality, efficiency, creativity, productivity, originality, diversity, etc. That is, assuming we're discussing market operations and not force-based operations.
"We" can't improve currency (make it more accurate if "we" want more accurate currency) if a part of "we" insists on employing any means imaginable, or unspeakable, to eliminate competition - such as libel.
U.S. National currency is not accurate, not "constantly improving", not "quality"; but it may be efficient at transferring purchasing power from the victims, and I can see why so much power is spent on apologizing for it, hiding it, disguising it, ignoring it, and why some people employ their own power to censor any person who may happen to raise the subject above a whisper.
A competitive viewpoint (among many competitive viewpoints) is the following.
Since property rights are the root of civilization, competition is its life blood.
Since morality is the root of civilization, cooperation is its life blood, because cooperation is required to access division of labor, specialization, and economies of scale.
If anyone reading this has ever worked in a setting of cooperation, where the team is working together for a specific goal, each with their one special talent, each being productive with time and energy focused on their part of the production, and during that harmony someone in the group begins to execute a plan where the plan is to get something for nothing, to use someone in the group as a stepping stone to an easier job, and that nefarious someone begins to create lies, communicate lies to some central power, some team leader of sorts, and at that moment when that 'defector' executes the plan, the team's productivity falters, in-fighting begins, as that one 'defector' employs plan B, if you have been there, do you now see a parallel example?
Plan B?
- The goal is to supply the highest quality product at the lowest cost and win by reaching that goal.
- The goal is to torture and mass murder all competitors and then be in a position to supply crap (inaccurate currency) at a high cost (debt reaching into the trillions and tortured bodies piling up into the millions).