 |
PM |  | |
Quote | | |
Reply | | |
Full Topic | |
| Joined: | Mon Nov 21st, 2005 |
| Location: | California USA |
| Posts: | 6399 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
| Mana: |    |
When "News" is bottled up, if you can borrow my brain, the reason for this action (bottling up), the thought that drives it, is fear, and the fear is that competition will find a way to break through, real news will pass through the barriers that block accurate currency from flowing between separate and sovereign beings.
It would be easy for Congressman Frank to hold hearings on the bill. This would allow Dr. Paul to bring in expert witnesses on the FED to make the case for an independent audit. It would get a lot of YouTube play.
When accurate currency (real news) passes between separate and sovereign beings, like wildfire, becoming viral, the effect is a more powerful bunch of separate and sovereign people.
The fear is a fear of competition. The act of "bottling up" is an act intending to destroy competition.
Competition leads to quality increases while costs (prices) decrease.
The subject matter here is: "The Fed", the people I call legal criminals or "Legal Criminals" (no caps is better if by "better" the idea is to focus defensive thoughts and actions toward the actual criminals who think out and act out crimes and "better" is to avoid focusing attention on "the group", since actual people are response-able and "groups" are not "responsible" or "accountable"), and "The Fed" (the people) are criminals, so my label is more accurate in that sense.
A. Legal Criminals
B. The Fed
Who blocks the flow of accurate currency when you hear my accurate term (legal criminal) as that term flows through your central processor?
Do you fear competition too?
The fear of competition is a fear that is driven by a false sense of security concerning a supposed advantage or "leverage" held by the people stricken with fear, and I can explain this point of perceptive focus.
The people who have the power to add zeros to their own accounts, and do so at will, and do so without being held accountable for any debt whatsoever, are people who think that they have an advantage over people who do not have this power. The idea, in the head of someone who has this power, is such that the loss of this power is fearful.
What are they going to do when they no longer have the power to add zeros to their own personal bank accounts?
Who will have that power once that power is no longer held by these people who fear the loss of that power?
These are questions that focus attention at the problem, the specific problem, and the problem that has so far managed to metastasize into "legal" torture and mass murder, and the torture and murder victims are "paid for" by you and me - because of this problem, because this problem works the way it does.
Power flows from the many to the few by this effort to hold secure this power to add zeros to the accounts of the few people who have this power.
What is there to fear?
- Few people have the power to add zeros to their personal banking accounts and do so without accountability for that creation of that growing account (and it does grow larger every time that power is held by a few people over many people).
- Those few people abuse that power to transfer wealth from the many to them.
- Those few people will lose that power once the victims realize their eventual fate (to be tortured and murdered eventually)
- The power to add zeros is a monopoly power, and not, specifically not, a competitive power INTERNALLY.
The power to add zeros to a few personal accounts (and by that power wealth transfers from the many to the few) is the power that finances all forms of "government" including "Corporations", "States", "Despotism", "Monarchy", "Kingdoms", "Federally Constituted Republics", or even "Families".
If that power is given up, if the barriers are torn down, if there are no monopolies ever, nevermore, here in this land (internally), what happens in other lands (externally)?
That is the source of fear that is injected into the minds of the victims, and I can explain that too, to anyone who wants to know the truth of it.
If I'm wrong, I'd like to know exactly what is wrong with my thinking.
An example of how I would explain that fear thing is by pointing to China.
- American "STATE" financed by a legal currency monopoly (few people adding numbers to their own personal accounts)
- Chinese "STATE" financed by the same type of monopoly (an external competitor)
It is not, it is a false fear, it is delusional, it is the essence of "The Problem".
If "we" are competing with the "Chinese", to see who is the most powerful monopoly (few people adding to their person accounts at the expense of many people), then the focus of attention MUST BE focused on the purpose of that "entity" (the few people's version of that "entity"), and the focus MUST NOT BE confused with legal crime.
A. Competition to be the best legal crime extortion racket
B. Competition to be the best defenders of liberty
Please see that illustration, and if you can't see it, please ask questions. One competition is real and the other competition is false.
A. The victims are the many people in each "entity" as the leaders pretend to fight each other (they actually form a consortium or cabal or a mutual agreement to leave each other's turf alone, or to combine their power to consume the victims i.e. war)
B. The competition is a race to see which "entity" prospers and gains power in defense of liberty
One actually gains more power, more wealth, more prosperity, without limit, and the other throttles down that power to prosper, and it does so: on purpose, for profit ("it" is refereed here as a "methodology" a "path" a road to follow, the actual people herding the victims on this road are the actual response-able people, the "accountable" people).
The "cabal" (leaders agreeing to victimize their own victims in their own turf or the leaders agreeing to "cull the herd" by executing mutually profitable wars among between their respective victims) is PATH A (the one we are on now).
Liberty is the path that results in the most power produced soonest, or, in other words: the most benefit for the least cost.
I may be alone with this viewpoint, and that may be another angle of view, where that fact illustrates the same problem, or that fact measures the power of the barriers set in place to "bottle up" the flow of powerfully accurate data (accurate currency).
Read the link at the top of this post, if you will.
Or not.
The link reports on an effort to hold the legal criminals to account for their crimes - in an accurately measurable way (follow the money).