 |
PM |  | |
Quote | | |
Reply | | |
Full Topic | |
| Joined: | Mon Nov 21st, 2005 |
| Location: | California USA |
| Posts: | 6399 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
| Mana: |    |
I may find cause to comment after viewing.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6767qPd1iPg
That is part I
Comment: I find it very difficult to listen to any false apologies for the crimes being committed by "The President" (no matter who sits in that seat), where the "reporters" say things like: "he inherited" the crime.
The "cost of the war" is not a cost to the promoters of the war. Why is the focus of attention moved away from finding the specific people who profit from the crime ("war") so as to find the people who cause and perpetuate the crime, find the motive and therefore find the perpetrators, then expose those specific criminals?
Why not do that?
Why apologize for the crimes and why apologize for the criminals? Why confuse the purpose of the crime with things like "find the criminals who attacked us on 911"?
Why lie?
Why perpetuate lies?
It seems to me, and I'm not alone, even if "the majority" think I'm alone, a lone lunatic, a conspiracy theorist, etc,; it seems to me that the paper trail followed from the crimes (war) in Afghanistan lead back to the same people who destroyed those buildings in New York (by controlled demolition, along with all the people inside those buildings).
I could be wrong, but why not follow the paper trail, if not to expose the worst criminals currently torturing the most people and currently murdering the most people, why not do that just to prove me wrong?
The paper trail leads to the criminals.
Why not cut the flow of paper trailing from those who earn wealth to those who are now stealing it, now using it to torture, using it to mass murder, using it to apologize for torture and mass murder, using it to cover up and perpetuate that flow of wealth, and those crimes?
If the flow is cut off, and if the crimes suddenly lessen, lessen more and more each day, grind to a stop, no more legal torture soon, no more legal mass murder soon, then doesn't that prove something worth proving?
What is the profit in allowing the flow to continue?
What generates that demand for that flow that continues to go from the honest productive people who produce wealth to those horrible terrorizing torturing mass murderers who set their own pay rates and give themselves license to rob, rape, steal, torture, and mass murder with impunity on into perpetuity?
If there is a supply, there must be a demand - no?
I went past the last link (the "apologetic" commentary) and went to the source link instead:
http://rethinkafghanistan.com/