 |
PM |  | |
Quote | | |
Reply | | |
Full Topic | |
| Joined: | Mon Nov 21st, 2005 |
| Location: | California USA |
| Posts: | 6399 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
| Mana: |    |
Karen Kwaitkowski wrote those words. I think it is more of the stuff that I like to call accurate currency, the stuff that moves minds to begin thinking accurately. But that may just be me.
The anti-liberty mindset would also explain how Americans quietly bear government taxation that consumes over half of what they make each hour, and each year. At this point, logic tells us that no future generation will be able to pay the obligations taken on by our government. But an anti-liberty mindset certainly explains why Americans tend to believe that our children somehow will be willing to try!
My guess is that Karen thinks that her words are accurate enough to accomplish some specific task.
The theme of this article, this example of accurate currency, asks a specific question, and the accurate answer is worthy of consideration. I think the false answer is the answer used by people who fall into the category of Machiavelli types, or Statists, or to be even more focused, more precise, and more accurate, the thinking that generates the false answer originates from un-natural criminal minds.
I suppose that it can be suggested, with words, that criminal minds are natural experiments of mutated DNA; where the criminal brain, absent the stuff that generates sympathy, empathy, etc. is a naturally occurring genetic mutation. I think that would be a false representation of nature, since nature has a job to do, and that job is to further life, to preserve it, to make life prosper, to cause life to exist, to sustain life, and to keep life going and going and going. Why would nature produce a killer, a torturer, and a mass murderer?
If nature produces a species killer, does that part of nature test the validity of the targeted species?
I am going to continue reading the article and continue commenting from an accurate currency (based upon Joe's Law) perspective.
There is power in accurate currency, and accurate currency can move people from false and destructive paths toward true and productive paths - from miserable slow death to prosperous and exciting life. Perhaps I have that backwards too?
Someone invents the false stuff for some reason, what could be the reasoning?
Back to Karen (Lieutenant Colonel) Kwiatkowski:
The "news" offered before that statement concerned a few polls that could be checked for validity. I attended a junior college course called Statistics and Dynamics (or some such title) back in the 80s, and even then the sophistication of propaganda was remarkable. There is a great power in mass media as a means by which massive numbers of people can be stupefied, and those massive numbers of people can be conditioned to respond to "polls" in such a way as to generate false data.
It seems to me that the anti-liberty mindset is the most serious challenge facing America today - even beyond the ongoing catastrophe of our fiat-money system that continues to enable the corporate state. The fiat-money system will eventually crash the state - but we will still be battling the anti-liberty mindset in the smoking ruins.
If someone reads the false data and comes to false conclusion as a result of the employment of false data, what does that fact inspire in the reader, the author, or the fellow members of a discussion forum?
I can offer an example of what I am describing here, in reaction to the commentary offered by Karen Kwiatkowski - currently.
Suppose a poll asks for opinions concerning who is or who is not esteemed to a high degree, up on a pedestal?
Suppose the majority answer with a highest esteem for the police and the military workers.
You call these guys up, and they do the dirty work - clean-up on isle 5.
That data, if that data is inspected, judged, chewed on, and then employed, could be spun into a false esteem for police and military leadership - a false measure of esteem for the people who are in between the employers of the police and military and the actual peace officers and grunts in the police and the military.
How can that data be made more accurate so as to re-assess the situation with a greater concern for measuring the esteem of the people with regard to liberty, with regard to prosperity, with regard to peace, with regard to harmony, with regard to the work that the police must do, and with regard to the work that the military must do, in defense against all criminals of any kind from any quarter?
Here is an example:
http://texasfred.net/archives/3814
Take the same people who generated the data in the polls reference by Karen Kwiatkowski and ask those people to place Oath Keepers above or below the mindless order followers in either the police or military employment theaters.
Run the poll like this:
Do you place Nazi type order followers who rape, torture, and mass murder innocent babies, because they are told to do so, above or below Oath Keepers who will not follow unlawful orders where they are told to commit such crimes by their criminal bosses?
- You love our home grown Nazis
- You don't love Nazis past or present
What happens to the conclusions derived from the poll data? How does our liberty minded or anti-liberty minded public measure up after that poll? How does that poll measure up as "accurate currency"?
How many will answer A? How many will answer A if the poll taker thinks that punishment will occur for failure to answer A?
Beware of Greeks offering gifts?
I'm going to send the link to this forum to Karen Kwiatkowski, since that is what I have done, in the past, when commenting on people who write things, and when those people leave their e-mail addresses after their writing is published to the public - for public consumption.
And that is why I read Karen Kwaitkowski, she is ever so ready to test her thinking for validity. The scientific method still lives and breaths in human form.
However, the anti-liberty mindset may be itself vulnerable to collapse.
The U.S. military, by that example, that Lieutenant Colonel, is cause for high esteem.
Is there a natural anti-liberty mindset? No, there is not. Children want to ask questions, to explore, to experiment, and to think.
Who will be there when you really, really, need them?