 |
PM |  | |
Quote | | |
Reply | | |
Full Topic | |
| Joined: | Mon Nov 21st, 2005 |
| Location: | California USA |
| Posts: | 6399 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
| Mana: |    |
Two items of news cross my path, one like a black cat, and the other like an insider trade option.
Here is one link:
http://www.brasschecktv.com/page/671.html
Here is a relevant quote:
The source of that quote, the link, and the subject matter in the link, including that quote, are all pointing to something happening now, pointing to something that has happened, and pointing to something that may happen.
The original "Crash" of 1929 that historians moan and groan about was NOTHING compared to what followed in 1931 to 1932.
Again, don't take my word for it. Look at the charts from that era. You'll see that it's impossible to overstate the seriousness of the potential precipice we're standing on - all the worse because "rising stock prices" are lulling people into a sense of false security.
What is at the center of all that pointing? If someone could know what is at the center of all that pointing, then someone could look outward from that center from a position of greater clarity concerning the origin of all the news making events; to see how that news is generated, on that subject matter.
The center of all that news, the source of all that news, is very likely a place where a few people decide to increase or decrease the supply of legal dollars and then a decision is made as to who receives or who gives up that adjustment in that total supply of that legal currency issue.
The individual who is outside that group of powerful people may not appreciate the power that is contained within that group of powerful people; and therefore the individual who is outside that group of powerful people may ignore the significance of the power that is contained within that group of powerful people as that group of powerful people increase and decrease the supply of legal currency within the legal boundaries of the U.S. Federal legal regime.
Not having a working understanding of how economy is altered by political power, such as the power supplied by a legal license to monopolize legal currency, is also deleterious toward the goal of understanding the significance and appreciation of the power wielded by a legal currency issue monopoly.
From a position of understanding and appreciation for the power wielded by specific people who are able to increase and decrease the total supply of legal dollars, from that position the perception is specific, from that position of understanding the perception is such that the link I linked here is half true, and the other half is wildly fantastic, or speculatively unreliable.
If the power to monopolize is a power, for example, the power will destroy competition, or the power will not be a powerful monopoly. If the power is unable to remove competitors, it will not be a monopoly power, and that relationship will be a proportionate one, where the monopoly power will be in proportion to the share of consumers who drop the monopoly purchasing power for something better.
That is an explanation for my taking the specific quote out of the specific link.
Here is the link again:
http://www.brasschecktv.com/page/671.html
The link concerns a new method of gaining power from victims by a new way of manipulating the currency issue. The new method employs the capacity to increase the velocity of favorable transfers. The link describes a get rich quick methodology.
I quote the part where the authors of the link prefer to take the information as a warning of some future calamity. Doom Day is on the horizon - supposedly.
I see something different. When product X is no longer good for anything other than stealing, then product Y is going to gain market share (even black market share if necessary).
Just because (and there really isn't must justice in it), just because something is legal (like a legal money monopoly) isn't proof of its legitimacy, it's sound economy, it's moral standing, or even its capacity to cause obedience among its target audience.
If the dictators really, really, really, really must have their economic depression, to end all depressions, to be the greatest ever, or whatever, they may have to do more than lie, and falsify, to get it, and to keep it going at the level they wish - the low level.
The "economy" (actual people working to produce the necessities of life, and then some) is depressed by a supply of currency that is made scarce on purpose, made so scarce as to heighten the demand for currency well in excess of what could be considered normal or above just what one would think to be right.
That is the lead in for the second link that I get as an e-mail because I'm on an e-mail list. I won't quote the whole e-mail, just this part:
It's been a tremendous time for Tesla Motors. In May, Tesla secured a $50 million investment and strategic partnership with Germany's Daimler, maker of Mercedes. We also delivered our 500th Roadster -- the only car in the world that offers performance with a clean conscience. In June, we were among the first automakers to get approval for Department of Energy loans. The $465 million in interest-bearing loans - entirely unrelated to the bailout of bankrupt automakers -- will help finance production engineering and assembly of the Model S, the all-electric sedan. The loans will also fund an assembly plant where we will produce electric vehicle powertrain components for affordable EVs, such as the Smart city car and other platforms.There is a longer story to tell on this new day of news; but readers are in short supply, so there really isn't much demand for actual news, news that is significant, news that is productive, etc. The demand for accurate currency is artificually low, for reasons that become clear with a little productive effort.