 |
PM |  | |
Quote | | |
Reply | | |
Full Topic | |
| Joined: | Mon Nov 21st, 2005 |
| Location: | California USA |
| Posts: | 6399 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
| Mana: |    |
Together, they wrecked much of the world economy because of their shared "fatal conceit" (F.A. Hayek’s term) that government central planners were superior to private property and free markets.
Anyone,
Why are these messages written in code? Why must there be such a huge gap between the words and the meaning behind the words? If the idea is to accurately identify specific people who plan on and follow through with the plan to injure innocent people; then why not call that what it is – in fact?
What is the idea where the idea is to accurately identify specific criminals?
A. Defensive government
B. Accurate perception employed in defence against victimization
C. A recruitment tool
Once the idea bears fruit, where the accurate perception tool is employed toward identifying legal criminals, where the people who are guilty of pre-meditated destruction of innocent life are known, then does the idea become a form of “The British are Coming” where Paul Revere spreads the word?
If the idea is to accurately know who intends to injure innocent people, for profit, or just for fun, and that same idea is then moved into an advertisement phase, where the idea becomes a warning of some sort, let all the innocent people beware, then why does the warning have to be couched in these mysterious terms?
Here is the quote again:
Together, they wrecked much of the world economy because of their shared "fatal conceit" (F.A. Hayek’s term) that government central planners were superior to private property and free markets.
“Government Central Planners”, “Property” and “Free Markets”.
The bad guys appear to be those evil government central planners.
Now, please, what is the idea where the idea is to accurately identify specific criminals?
Who are the bad guys? Who has the idea where the idea is to accurately identify specific criminals?
Here is a guy, this Tom guy, and he has this idea where the idea is to accurately identify “Government Central Planners” – is this true?
What is Tom doing? He, if I may answer my own question, is planning on doing something. He must have planned on writing those words – no? Is Tom centrally located? Is Tom a Central Planner? Why has Tom governed his word choices so as to misidentify the legal criminals as being “Government Central Planners”?
Why blame “government” for actions of human beings? What is the plan behind this governing of words so as to mislead, misidentify, disguise, deceive, miss-communicate, and falsely propagate falsehood?
I have to say, to any reader, that I have a whole lot in common with this Tom guy, more than I have in common with most everyone else, however, please, see the diversions.
Why is “property” being communicated in such a way as to suggest that “private property” represents “the good guys”?
Why do people plan on and then execute their plans to suggest that “property” is good, bad, or even indifferent? What is the reasoning for introducing this idea of “property” as if “property” were capable of thought and or action?
Example:
Suppose a robot was constructed where the robot has a program built into the robot and the robot will torture and mass murder millions of people if some person turns the robot on.
Please think about that above example as an illustration of why I think Tom is spreading a whole lot of false propaganda, as Tom becomes a “Government Central Planner” in that effort to spread that specific false propaganda concerning this supposed “private property” stuff.
P.S. I wrote an e-mail to Tom (a plan of mine to warn Tom about the things I publish in reference to what Tom publishes)
Last edited on Fri Jun 12th, 2009 12:02 pm by Joe Kelley