 |
PM |  | |
Quote | | |
Reply | | |
Full Topic | |
| Joined: | Mon Nov 21st, 2005 |
| Location: | California USA |
| Posts: | 6399 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
| Mana: |    |
Apparently, according to my wife, a document arrived in the mail declaring authority over my person and property. As far as I can tell the author of the document intends to punish me for offenses that the author has determined to be a possible future crime.
I am not as concerned about the crime that I am being accused of possibly committing as much as my curiosity is focused on why I am being accused beforehand.
In essence my future crime is uncertain, therefore, no such crime can be known. Are my fellow citizens, the people, insane?
From my perspective:
This news, delivered by my wife verbally, amounts to a robber sending me advance notice of his or her intent to rob me.
Here is the insane part:
Robbers, murderers, rapists, torturers, slanderer, libelers, con men, and the like, criminals, are much more effective if they hide their intentions rather than announce them in advance. I now have the vital means necessary to build an effective defense. I know now what the criminals intend to do to me if they convict me of this future crime, according to their stated intent, as far as I can tell.
The insanity goes much deeper:
The criminals may offer to provide me with financial and intellectual resources necessary to defend against their intended crime upon me!
I have been ordered to participate in a trial on a specific date i.e. April 20, 2006.
As far as I can tell, again according to my wife, a failure to appear will result in harm to me, my person, or, if I submit to the robbery, my property will be taken from me in the form of a fine.
The details of just how I will be swindled or brutally robbed are not known by me at this time. That bit of ignorance on my part may or may not be a detail that aids in my defence.
An old saying, hearsay perhaps, concerns me:
Ignorance of the law is no excuse.
I wonder if I should participate in this crime or not. I am after all; ignorant.
If I do volunteer to abide by the summons, as vague as it is at this time, it seems appropriate, to me, the ignorant one, to seek the legal council available at the scene of the future crime.
I’m printing a copy of the document linked above in preparation for this future crime. I plan on gathering evidence while the event takes place.
If anyone reading this is of the mind that my future crime is a fantasy constructed by me and in their best judgment - I, the person writing this stuff, is delusional or at best; impractical, then, I am all for defending your opinion as any effort on my part to defend your opinion is likely to aid in my own defense.
If the reader is inclined to keep an open mind on the question of this topic titled Summons, then, I think that it is important to link a web page to illustrate my concern concerning any dealings with the ‘authorities’.
Before looking at the link it may help to offer my take on the link.
First:
People are responsible for they do regardless of opinion. Responsibility is individual; it is a simple matter of cause and effect. I do something and something happens.
Second:
My earnings from work included payments that can be traced, in part, to the purchase of the tools, and the wages or salaries of the people using those tools, at the event recorded on the web site linked below.
Third:
I have since realized just how responsible I am concerning that event.
Fourth:
That event can be viewed in a number of ways depending upon the individual judgment possessed by the individual doing the judging.
Fifth:
There is no escaping individual judgment; unless the individual is suffering from insanity. A mind is a terrible thing to waste.
Here is the link:
http://www.public-action.com/SkyWriter/WacoMuseum/death/81/81_aut.html
Here is an example of evidence:
You are the judge.
Please.