 |
PM |  | |
Quote | | |
Reply | | |
Full Topic | |
| Joined: | Mon Nov 21st, 2005 |
| Location: | California USA |
| Posts: | 6399 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
| Mana: |    |
++++++++++++
FREE Energy!!! I have several friends, with actual working vehicles... It Works!
++++++++++++
Zekiel,
We are brainy beings. Our actions involve willful calculations as well as routine, instinctual, even robotic repetitive reactions. In order to break out of the routine, for human beings, the mind must be willfully employed.
Lesson number one, for the criminals, is to destroy the propensity to employ brain power by the victims. Victims will not be victims once victims employ their brains willfully.
I offered a test in the other thread and this test is even easier to do than converting an automobile to burn water as fuel. This is an economical test. This is a brain test. This is a test of individual will power.
Before anyone spends another penny (a penny is now a very good bargain at half cost/price) on phone charges (there are now many scams where phone bills are charged to customers for absolutely nothing but fraud) consider the following:
http://www.magicjack.com/4/index.asp
I ordered one. It is on the mail. The willful practice of bypassing unnecessary expenses such as long distance phone charges are already becoming routine in the gaming industry where gamers are employing voice communications programs over the internet.
Here are a few examples:
http://www.goteamspeak.com/
http://www.ventrilo.com/
Note the business model (FREE DOWNLOAD)
No one can challenge the facts here without an obvious embrace of falsehood.
Phone companies employ legal methods of stealing power from people. People employ legal methods of stealing power from people.
Who is given the license to supply people with phone service? Who is given the license to own and sell the medium of exchange?
If someone wishes to test out the theories (conspiracy theories), then someone can. Consider, for example, the phone bill. How much is the phone bill?
What does the phone bill purchase? Can the phone bill be reduced?
The answer is: yes.
The answer is not: no.
Now employ math.
1. Lower the phone bill (from many people to a few people)
2. Lower the fuel bill (from many people to a few people)
3. Lower the mortgage interest bill (from many people to a few people)
4. Lower the insurance bill (from many people to a few people)
When testing, please consider, testing anyone who answers those questions above with a “impossible” answer.
An “impossible” answer is an answer that does not lead to actual lowering of one through four.
Add the phone bill for one person once that bill is lowered by, say, 90 percent (or more).
Add the phone bills up for everyone who lowers their phone bills by 90 percent or more.
Example:
100 dollars per month for 3 billion people becomes 10 dollars per moth for 3 billion people.
That is a rough average that can be scaled up or down from 100 dollars to 1000 dollars or 10 dollars where the reduction remains to be 90 percent.
You and I already know how water is fuel and that switching to water as fuel is merely a matter of right action overcoming wrong routine. I tend to think that Solar Power will be the most power for the least cost as electric cars will dominate the transportation industry. Either way, water as fuel, solar fuel, a mixture of many kinds of fuel, the end result is the same where fuel costs lower and answer number two on my list.
Add up one person’s reduction in fuel costs and then add 3 billion people reducing fuel costs flowing from those consumers to the present suppliers of fuel, which are the oil companies.
100 dollars per month multiplied by 3 billion people reduces by 90 percent down to 10 dollars per month.
Now we have two things to add up.
Phone and fuel goes from 200 (times 3 billion) to 20 dollars per month flowing from the people who work for a living and produce wealth to people who profit from phone and fuel supply licenses.
Now move to number 3, which is mortgage or ‘legal tender’ interest. This is a big one. This is the monster that sucks the life out of a liberated economy. A person who must exist on this planet must work for and pay for a home all his or her life. The charge of interest, the minimum, will force a person to work and pay for two homes over the span of a 30 year mortgage. That relationship transfers power from those who earn it, create it, and maintain it to those who gain the license to supply legal tender.
Add that up.
Each person pays double for a home – minimum (if they borrow the credit to do so). Therefore the simple way to compute that simple interest saving, in my opinion, is to eliminate it (for people proven to be credit worthy). If the monthly mortgage average for home and business persons is 1000 per month: 500 per month is a simple stroke of the pen or press of the keyboard keypad.
Enter
From 100 phone, 100 fuel, and 1000 mortgage to 10 phone, 10 fuel, and 500 mortgage and times that individual reduction in cost by 3 billion.
From 1200 billion per month to 520 billion per month flowing from those who produce wealth to those who have the license to supply (and monopolize) communication, fuel energy, and legal money.
Now move to the biggest expense on the list: insurance.
This effort is already well beyond the sound bite and therefore less likely to gain currency, be read, be understood, serve to educate, inspire willful employment of brain power, or otherwise transfer accurately from me to the reader so I am going to cut this part as short as possible; potentially leaving out vital data.
Insurance is more than that which meets the eye. Insurance will cost the beneficiary as power flows to a collection point or fund. Insurance will then flow out of the collective fund to individuals who must have that power or they will suffer. Insurance is deterrence.
Factor the investment in deterrence to the reduction in costs by any means possible and see what your brain can compute accurately. I can help test your results if you ask for my help.
Suppose that there is no net gain or loss in either side of the insurance cost/benefit ratio and therefore suppose that no savings is earned by lowering insurance costs while retaining the same insurance benefits. This is hardly reasonable considering the current state of insurance costs and insurance benefits, yet the subject isn’t even on the table – currently. No power is willfully expended toward actual reduction in insurance costs so as to increase insurance benefits currently; however, there are expenditures currently and willfully being expended toward increasing the price of insurance while reductions in benefits are willfully and effectively reduced.
Adding up current realities will then net the following:
1. 90 percent reduction in communication costs
2. 90 percent reduction in transportation costs
3. 90 percent reduction in legal money costs
4. Costs for insurance remain the same while insurance benefits remain the same.
Now your brain, if you have followed this far, may be taxed beyond capacity. You will now be given, or offered, an over-supply of data. Your brain may explode. I can’t say. I can say that no one follows this to date. No one can see this and communicate this understanding back to me, as accurate feedback, yet.
Take the savings from the first three, communication, transportation, and legal currency costs and invest those savings into reducing the costs of insurance while increasing the benefits of insurance as deterrence.
Did your brain explode?
If the people collect their power into a single powerful bank or fund and employ that power as a means of deterring crime what happens?
Answer: Criminals steal that power
Or
NOT
Either it works or:
“We furnish the means by which we suffer.”
http://www.restoretherepublic.com/component/option,com_fireboard/Itemid,27/func,view/catid,34/id,6958/#6958