View single post by Joe Kelley
 Posted: Fri Apr 4th, 2008 10:21 am
PM Quote Reply Full Topic
Joe Kelley

 

Joined: Mon Nov 21st, 2005
Location: California USA
Posts: 6399
Status: 
Offline
Mana: 
http://www.lewrockwell.com/roberts/roberts242.html

If Americans have any honor, how can they betray their Founding Fathers, who gave them liberty, by tolerating a government that claims immunity to law and the Constitution and is erecting a police state in their midst?

 

That falsehood could explain many questions. The U.S. Constitution ended liberty in America. The U.S. Constitution ensured the power of the few to control the many through currency manipulation as proven when George Washington supressed the last battle of the American Revolution (The false labeled Whiskey Rebellion).

The U.S. Constitition was a dirty deal made between southern slave masters and northern slave masters and the 'dirty compromise' required to extort these legal criminials set the stage for the battle between the North and the South (The false labeled Civil War).

If someone concludes that "The Founding Fathers" gave "us" liberty that someone might also conclude that America is 'represented' by "representatives" in government. America isn't THE STATE. America is a land of people who are controlled by a few legal criminals. The power of those legal criminals is stolen through falsehood and violence. American's are as much the victims as any other people on the planet.

Read that link and know that the person who wrote it is duped, ignorant, or stupid when it comes to the BIG LIE.

This one:

If Americans have any honor, how can they betray their Founding Fathers, who gave them liberty, by tolerating a government that claims immunity to law and the Constitution and is erecting a police state in their midst? 

If a person does not recognize the cause the person will treat symptoms. The cause of the violence is violent people and the reason for their immunity is falsehood. We the people trust our form of government that was rotten from day one. We expect the legal criminals to behave better because it is the right thing to do according to the law of the land.

HELLO!

The law of the land since The Constitution's start has been:

http://www.law.cornell.edu/constitution/constitution.articlei.html#section8

To provide for calling forth the militia to execute the laws of the union, suppress insurrections and repel invasions;

From day one the document (the law of the land) meant to suppress LIBERTY.

Here is your confession:

http://www.earlyamerica.com/earlyamerica/milestones/whiskey/text.html

And whereas, it is in my judgment necessary under the circumstances of the case to take measures for calling forth the militia in order to suppress the combinations aforesaid, and to cause the laws to be duly executed; and I have accordingly determined so to do, feeling the deepest regret for the occasion, but withal the most solemn conviction that the essential interests of the Union demand it, that the very existence of government and the fundamental principles of social order are materially involved in the issue, and that the patriotism and firmness of all good citizens are seriously called upon, as occasions may require, to aid in the effectual suppression of so fatal a spirit;

That is King George of America suppressing LIBERTY as people peacefully protested against a tax on whiskey BECAUSE no one had any money to pay the TAX since they were using whiskey AS CURRENCY.

The people of the times knew exactly what happened. The BANKERS (Alexander Hamilton) took over the country with a currency fraud. The same 'troops' who volunteered to fight against the British (and their currency fraud) were fighting against the new KING GEORGE or they were conscripted into the suppression of that last battle FOR LIBERTY.

Either Paul Craig Roberts is naive, stupid, or ignorant. The U.S. Constitution is only 'better' than the NEW LAW OF THE LAND because the new KING GEORGE has placed humans on the torture table and, of course, Nuclear War is also 'on the table'. Sure, The Constitution could be used to bring a brutal dictator back in line with past dictators who were less brutal.

Who is the stupid one?