 |
PM |  | |
Quote | | |
Reply | | |
Full Topic | |
| Joined: | Mon Nov 21st, 2005 |
| Location: | California USA |
| Posts: | 6399 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
| Mana: |    |
I tried to read the above and to offer a measure of why that ispiration evaporated I offer this:
http://www.theonion.com/content/video/diebold_accidentally_leaks
If the accounting process is false, why credit it to be true?
Why support by innuendo that nothing is wrong with the account? Accuracy does mean something specific. Why ignore it?