 |
PM |  | |
Quote | | |
Reply | | |
Full Topic | |
| Joined: | Mon Nov 21st, 2005 |
| Location: | California USA |
| Posts: | 6399 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
| Mana: |    |
Ron Paul intends to use Gold as currency as a means of accomplishing a specific end.
The writer above equates that intention with business as usual. I think differently.
So long as Ron Paul does not make competitive currencies illegal, then, the Gold Currency Legal Tender for the U.S. National Government fact will not 'out-law' competition and will not create a currency monopoly such as our current costly currency system is today.
Think in terms of market anarchism and you may get the idea.
Do not monopolize your thinking by limiting your vocabulary with terms like "Privatize" and "Public". Try to improve the accuracy of the thought process with words like "Voluntary" and "Involuntary".
Accurate
and
Inaccurate
If a Ron Paul were to make Gold as Legal Tender (as currency), then, how will that currency stand the test of free market competition (not Black Market or 'outlawed' competition)?
What would the exchange rate for anyone in the U.S. be if anyone works for and legally earns any of the following currencies?
Yaun
Yen
Euro
Google dollars
Microsoft money
Is it impossible to imagine being paid, working for, and spending anything but DOLLARS?
If so, then, you have found a huge COST.
The COST is FALSEHOOD.